1
00:00:00,944 --> 00:00:02,574
Now we're going to move
up to yellow cards.

2
00:00:02,723 --> 00:00:07,133
And we're going to mix in some
of those things about RDI and

3
00:00:07,133 --> 00:00:09,803
moving up and down the elevator.

4
00:00:10,103 --> 00:00:12,053
And the briefing has this to offer.

5
00:00:12,353 --> 00:00:15,063
On the 5 minute yellows, it's playing
the ball after the whistle with high

6
00:00:15,063 --> 00:00:17,573
impact play or repeated offenses.

7
00:00:18,398 --> 00:00:22,588
Breakdown a play with high impact on play
or repeated offenses by intentionally

8
00:00:22,588 --> 00:00:24,778
using feet, body, or back of stick.

9
00:00:25,208 --> 00:00:28,248
And I'd actually like just to pause for
a second and just make a note of this.

10
00:00:28,468 --> 00:00:32,333
There's a lot of people who think that
intentionally playing the ball with your

11
00:00:32,333 --> 00:00:36,478
body, moving your foot into the way of the
ball, is always a five minute yellow card.

12
00:00:36,803 --> 00:00:38,173
I don't know where that comes from.

13
00:00:38,533 --> 00:00:42,043
Because that action
could be... Low impact.

14
00:00:42,293 --> 00:00:43,923
It looks obvious.

15
00:00:43,933 --> 00:00:47,853
So we say, ooh, I'm going to nail that and
I'm going to give it a five minute yellow.

16
00:00:47,853 --> 00:00:49,413
I'm really good at spotting fouls.

17
00:00:50,323 --> 00:00:53,843
Congratulations, but did it
have a high impact on the play?

18
00:00:54,443 --> 00:00:56,593
That takes your hockey
brain to figure out.

19
00:00:56,793 --> 00:01:00,313
And your experience being
applied to understanding what the

20
00:01:00,313 --> 00:01:01,663
players want in that situation.

21
00:01:01,993 --> 00:01:03,613
What were they trying
to achieve with that?

22
00:01:03,693 --> 00:01:04,663
Is it late in the game?

23
00:01:04,963 --> 00:01:07,033
Is it just outside the 23?

24
00:01:07,123 --> 00:01:09,203
Is it all these other things
that we would look at?

25
00:01:09,503 --> 00:01:12,463
There can be low impact
intentionally use of the body.

26
00:01:12,763 --> 00:01:15,283
Back to the five minute yellows, a
physical foul with the body or stick

27
00:01:15,283 --> 00:01:17,303
including off the ball instance.

28
00:01:17,863 --> 00:01:18,463
Physical.

29
00:01:18,763 --> 00:01:21,603
And all other repeated offenses
in the green card area.

30
00:01:21,993 --> 00:01:22,903
It goes back to this.

31
00:01:23,203 --> 00:01:24,253
Repeated offenses.

32
00:01:24,713 --> 00:01:27,263
Dangerous slash physical or high impact.

33
00:01:27,563 --> 00:01:29,573
We've got it all on lock.

34
00:01:29,873 --> 00:01:30,613
Isn't that nice?

35
00:01:30,913 --> 00:01:33,983
When you move to the 10 minute
yellow card offenses, you see the

36
00:01:33,983 --> 00:01:37,293
high impact deliberate breakouts
with no regard to player safety.

37
00:01:37,343 --> 00:01:38,193
Really dangerous.

38
00:01:38,493 --> 00:01:42,463
And that would include dangerous
tackles that ground or trip

39
00:01:42,463 --> 00:01:45,573
players, including slide tackles
by both attackers and defenders.

40
00:01:45,923 --> 00:01:51,053
And I'm not going to go through
slide tackles and what the difference

41
00:01:51,093 --> 00:01:55,423
between a tackle and just a sliding
dangerous motion is that could be 10

42
00:01:55,423 --> 00:01:58,583
minute yellow worthy on its own or not.

43
00:01:58,863 --> 00:02:02,623
We have this conversation very frequently
on the live streams and things like that.

44
00:02:02,643 --> 00:02:04,613
And it deserves its own sort of unit.

45
00:02:04,813 --> 00:02:09,883
But what I'm seeing here is we have
impact, we have danger, and then

46
00:02:09,883 --> 00:02:14,253
we have repeated offenses that are
repeated technical yellow card offenses.

47
00:02:15,008 --> 00:02:17,618
So again, we have RDI.

48
00:02:17,918 --> 00:02:20,678
The impression is already,
here's an example of repetition.

49
00:02:20,931 --> 00:02:23,566
I don't have the previous green
card that was given to Varga.

50
00:02:23,566 --> 00:02:26,796
In this situation, Vargas
gonna get another card and

51
00:02:26,796 --> 00:02:29,066
this time say yellow, is it?

52
00:02:29,071 --> 00:02:29,786
Yes, it is.

53
00:02:29,786 --> 00:02:33,476
Varga who picked up a green
earlier on, picks up a yellow.

54
00:02:33,476 --> 00:02:35,446
Now he did.

55
00:02:35,596 --> 00:02:39,725
He swished this ball there,
and he's already had one.

56
00:02:40,025 --> 00:02:44,215
What in that situation is what
would probably be a green card.

57
00:02:45,932 --> 00:02:49,532
Fairly low impact, nothing
particularly dangerous about it.

58
00:02:50,302 --> 00:02:55,312
We're in Q3 1205, so probably didn't
have a big impact on the play.

59
00:02:55,822 --> 00:03:01,315
But, it's his second
card of a similar nature.

60
00:03:01,585 --> 00:03:04,145
It absolutely needs to be there.

61
00:03:04,445 --> 00:03:04,925
Germany.

62
00:03:05,605 --> 00:03:06,805
Here's an example of danger.

63
00:03:06,805 --> 00:03:07,975
We do things the hard way here.

64
00:03:08,175 --> 00:03:09,535
Same umpire, oh my goodness.

65
00:03:15,882 --> 00:03:16,842
Yellow card.

66
00:03:18,365 --> 00:03:18,665
Wow.

67
00:03:18,965 --> 00:03:20,515
That's quite an escalation of things.

68
00:03:20,665 --> 00:03:23,515
It is, it's a total of
her, what you've just said.

69
00:03:23,825 --> 00:03:27,360
It might've been one of your 50
fifties Williams . Oh, Jim, yep.

70
00:03:28,304 --> 00:03:30,890
No the, the only, the, well there we are.

71
00:03:31,470 --> 00:03:32,815
Van Doren, I think we.

72
00:03:33,115 --> 00:03:37,125
So van Doren loved that card and that's
our second clip in a row featuring

73
00:03:37,125 --> 00:03:43,975
Dan Barstow, but this is a fantastic
example of a straight yellow because

74
00:03:44,055 --> 00:03:47,865
of danger and impact at the same time.

75
00:03:48,305 --> 00:03:55,365
And what we have later in this, when
this is a minute to go in quarter two.

76
00:03:55,525 --> 00:03:57,655
So that gives you a clue as to the impact.

77
00:03:58,085 --> 00:04:01,175
And when you look at the
entire pitch here, that.

78
00:04:01,555 --> 00:04:05,445
The German player actually had a lot
of room to work with, so it was a quite

79
00:04:05,445 --> 00:04:07,075
a threatening attack in that moment.

80
00:04:07,375 --> 00:04:13,045
So we've had a turnover, and
Belgium's out of pocket here, and

81
00:04:13,055 --> 00:04:15,885
there was a ton of space in front
of that attacker to continue.

82
00:04:16,285 --> 00:04:20,425
The impact of that foul with one minute
left in that quarter was huge, and

83
00:04:20,425 --> 00:04:22,285
this was the first card of the game.

84
00:04:23,115 --> 00:04:27,085
The other thing that makes it easy is
when you see here on this clip, where

85
00:04:27,095 --> 00:04:31,005
does van Doren make contact with the ball.

86
00:04:31,005 --> 00:04:31,765
He doesn't.

87
00:04:31,975 --> 00:04:35,275
He gets his opposing player
halfway up the stick.

88
00:04:35,905 --> 00:04:41,495
I'm not sure why he's arguing that
one, because it was not an okay tackle.

89
00:04:42,255 --> 00:04:46,425
So that's a fantastic example of
a danger slash impact, but let's

90
00:04:46,425 --> 00:04:47,795
focus on the danger part of it.

91
00:04:48,245 --> 00:04:49,675
Straight, yellow card.

92
00:04:51,999 --> 00:04:52,459
Full court.

93
00:05:02,019 --> 00:05:02,249
Cardo.

94
00:05:02,249 --> 00:05:04,299
Couldn't see what that was for.

95
00:05:04,599 --> 00:05:05,689
Long jog out to the...

96
00:05:05,989 --> 00:05:11,739
So when you see this foul in slow motion,
you can see, and this was another just

97
00:05:11,749 --> 00:05:18,202
straight yellow card, using the back
of the stick, just outside the 23.

98
00:05:18,592 --> 00:05:25,442
High impact, and therefore a really great
time to go straight to a yellow card.

99
00:05:28,379 --> 00:05:31,259
Here's an example of a five
minute yellow card that isn't in

100
00:05:31,259 --> 00:05:34,189
the briefing yet, but will be in
everybody's briefings very soon.

101
00:05:56,478 --> 00:06:02,283
So this is a pro league game
between Germany and Argentina, and

102
00:06:02,343 --> 00:06:09,629
Catalina Wenzel took a face mask,
tossed by the German defender.

103
00:06:10,479 --> 00:06:13,129
If you see right there, that's
where she got struck in the

104
00:06:13,149 --> 00:06:14,669
face with that yellow card.

105
00:06:14,969 --> 00:06:18,919
And, the penalty corner ended up
being re awarded for another reason.

106
00:06:19,739 --> 00:06:25,459
But, what we learned after this, is
that at this time, the umpires were

107
00:06:25,459 --> 00:06:26,969
just, Oh my gosh, what do we do?

108
00:06:26,999 --> 00:06:28,719
We have to, Cat's been split open.

109
00:06:29,179 --> 00:06:34,999
Cata she needs to go get stitches
and the and Bruce came in to work

110
00:06:34,999 --> 00:06:36,529
with Tyler and finish the game.

111
00:06:36,529 --> 00:06:37,999
That's why we have reserve umpires.

112
00:06:38,909 --> 00:06:43,599
But what we learned afterwards is that
the FIH Rules Committee was consulted

113
00:06:43,599 --> 00:06:48,969
immediately and they came back with the
information that this was a violation.

114
00:06:48,969 --> 00:06:50,609
There's David Ellcock there on the pitch.

115
00:06:50,919 --> 00:06:57,932
This is a violation of 9.16,
throwing any equipment at anybody

116
00:06:57,972 --> 00:06:59,652
on the pitch, including an umpire.

117
00:06:59,652 --> 00:07:02,782
So this is the only time where
an umpire can be fouled against.

118
00:07:03,622 --> 00:07:11,352
And that results in a reparation against
the team who committed that foul.

119
00:07:12,032 --> 00:07:15,412
Which is very interesting because
it doesn't actually really

120
00:07:15,412 --> 00:07:16,782
disadvantage the other team.

121
00:07:17,482 --> 00:07:22,248
But, it's a safety issue
that's well worth dealing with.

122
00:07:22,248 --> 00:07:26,522
Wellen fires it in, and his pair is safe!

123
00:07:26,522 --> 00:07:28,422
It's the yellow card.

124
00:07:28,422 --> 00:07:29,372
Diving in.

125
00:07:33,045 --> 00:07:51,335
So there's an example of an attacker going

126
00:08:03,794 --> 00:08:06,684
down on the slide in a dangerous way.

127
00:08:07,429 --> 00:08:08,689
That player's legs were static.

128
00:08:08,689 --> 00:08:10,832
If he was facing the other
way, you're going to bend these

129
00:08:10,832 --> 00:08:12,368
knuckles back, and that will work.

130
00:08:12,368 --> 00:08:15,499
I'll be very surprised if that's
only a 5 minute suspension.

131
00:08:16,059 --> 00:08:18,094
It might be the case that
method's come up very quickly.

132
00:08:21,140 --> 00:08:25,815
And here's an example of a different
straight 10 minute yellow card.

133
00:08:25,815 --> 00:08:27,530
And Lowenfeldt has gone down.

134
00:08:27,830 --> 00:08:29,450
The umpires have got a
decision to make here.

135
00:08:29,750 --> 00:08:32,280
Sean Rappaport just trying
to calm things down.

136
00:08:35,137 --> 00:08:40,616
He's a physical sport, and
there was a collision here.

137
00:08:40,836 --> 00:08:40,866
Not

138
00:08:46,293 --> 00:08:48,165
sure it was intentional.

139
00:08:48,165 --> 00:08:56,883
When you watch on this replay...
Well, Bouk does push Manfred before

140
00:08:57,693 --> 00:08:58,613
he gets pushed off it himself.

141
00:09:05,065 --> 00:09:09,962
Listen to me, I'm explaining the card
to you, it's in a dangerous position,

142
00:09:09,962 --> 00:09:15,735
you've put your stick there, you're going
off for 10 minutes, okay, yellow card.

143
00:09:16,035 --> 00:09:21,235
So some people wonder, and we're
obviously going to move into red cards

144
00:09:21,235 --> 00:09:25,265
in just a minute, but some people can
wonder what's the difference between,

145
00:09:25,695 --> 00:09:30,025
this as being a 10 minute yellow,
and when could it be a red card?

146
00:09:30,025 --> 00:09:37,496
But this is still in the course of
hockey, and It's very sloppy, it's

147
00:09:37,506 --> 00:09:42,086
very dangerous, it's not malicious,
but it's something that needs to be

148
00:09:42,086 --> 00:09:45,446
dealt with, and the reparation needs
to be made, and the message needs

149
00:09:45,446 --> 00:09:50,396
to be sent about how dangerous and
physical that particular play is.

150
00:09:50,786 --> 00:09:53,466
So that, again, is a straight
ten minute yellow card.

151
00:09:54,239 --> 00:09:59,659
Yeah that was definitely... That was
very sardonic, and I think, had that not

152
00:09:59,719 --> 00:10:04,699
been a yellow card already, then, Dan
may have had something to do, something

153
00:10:04,699 --> 00:10:06,259
more to say about that, but that was...

154
00:10:06,654 --> 00:10:07,974
Was that the bronze medal game?

155
00:10:08,274 --> 00:10:09,034
And that sort of thing.

156
00:10:09,034 --> 00:10:13,654
And I think in that moment, I think Dan
exercised a little bit of discretion.

157
00:10:13,954 --> 00:10:18,564
Yes, Taff, a few people have mentioned
that RID, as in get rid of these things

158
00:10:18,634 --> 00:10:22,854
from the game might be an acronym,
but I deliberately didn't go in that

159
00:10:22,864 --> 00:10:29,934
order because I don't love how that
language makes it seem like we're being

160
00:10:29,934 --> 00:10:32,524
dismissive or discarding something.

161
00:10:32,524 --> 00:10:32,844
That's fine.

162
00:10:33,454 --> 00:10:38,684
Really it's about we're resetting, we're
rebalancing, and we're sending messages

163
00:10:38,684 --> 00:10:40,144
and we're protecting and preventing.

164
00:10:40,154 --> 00:10:49,114
So I get, RID just didn't feel right to
me, but if people force me to, who knows?

165
00:10:49,984 --> 00:10:53,264
And yeah, Luke remembering the
Cata getting hit in the face mask.

166
00:10:53,824 --> 00:10:56,944
Yeah, defenders do need to know
where they're throwing their masks.

167
00:10:56,944 --> 00:10:58,504
They have full control
over where the mask goes.

168
00:10:58,624 --> 00:10:58,934
Yes.

169
00:10:59,434 --> 00:11:04,064
So even though she didn't mean to
hit her, she has to be cognizant

170
00:11:04,264 --> 00:11:07,874
and aware and she can't be reckless.

171
00:11:07,874 --> 00:11:14,789
And that's where the word intention gets,
leads us astray, and we don't look at

172
00:11:14,789 --> 00:11:19,649
whether something is actually in full
control, but reckless as to the result.

173
00:11:20,179 --> 00:11:22,939
That, that serves the intentionality.

174
00:11:23,289 --> 00:11:26,479
Yes, and Luke is explaining
the logic here of the 10 minute

175
00:11:26,479 --> 00:11:28,289
yellow versus the red card.

176
00:11:28,289 --> 00:11:29,629
Is something hockey ish happening?

177
00:11:30,019 --> 00:11:35,599
I'm not saying that it can't be a red
card, but... For example, if the ball

178
00:11:35,609 --> 00:11:38,889
had moved away and the two players
weren't still competing for the ball

179
00:11:38,889 --> 00:11:42,499
in that moment and then the stick comes
up, I do have a clip like that, Ruth,

180
00:11:42,519 --> 00:11:48,979
where a player, it's quite old, Rob
Hammond of Australia gets clipped in

181
00:11:48,979 --> 00:11:51,479
the face from a Pakistan player's stick.

182
00:11:51,849 --> 00:11:53,659
And that was a red card.

183
00:11:53,679 --> 00:11:57,129
The ball had already been passed
away and this was just a pure,

184
00:11:57,449 --> 00:11:58,599
I'm gonna hit you in the face.

185
00:11:58,899 --> 00:11:59,919
We'll get to that in a moment.

186
00:12:00,509 --> 00:12:02,999
Yeah, there, there was some, something.

187
00:12:02,999 --> 00:12:08,579
And that's the interesting part about our
role in preventing more serious cards.

188
00:12:08,879 --> 00:12:12,469
It's pretty uncommon to see a red
card come out of absolutely nowhere.

189
00:12:13,184 --> 00:12:14,884
Usually there's something there.

190
00:12:15,024 --> 00:12:18,424
The example that I actually have
that I show in a little bit is one of

191
00:12:18,424 --> 00:12:19,774
those that just came out of the blue.

192
00:12:19,784 --> 00:12:20,424
It was really weird.

193
00:12:20,734 --> 00:12:26,134
But, often, in our matches, it's because
we've failed to see something else

194
00:12:26,134 --> 00:12:29,414
that's happened or we haven't dealt
with, we haven't intervened properly on

195
00:12:29,414 --> 00:12:30,568
something else that's happened earlier.