NZLvGER Intentionally raised ball from a hit in mid-air

This contentious scenario, a testament to the skill and beauty of hockey, delves into the issue of whether players can elevate a raised ball with a hit. The execution of this skill is not only beautiful and exciting but also safe. However, rule 9.9 seemingly prohibits this action, except for shots at goal.

In this specific instance, the ball could arguably be pushed, as there is no extended backswing and it may even be under the 50cm guideline. The definition of a push or scoop doesn't even consider this skill being executed in mid-air, highlighting the outdated nature of these rules when applied to modern hockey skills.

It's important to acknowledge the umpire's decision-making process in real-time. Knowing this decision would not be reviewable as it occurred in the neutral area but had a high potential to lead to a big decision in the circle, the umpire seemed to elect to close the sliding door first. That said, it's hard to reconcile this call with the spirit of the game and the prime directive to focus on safety and leave the rest.

Lastly, we can consider the historical context of the rule against raised hits. which was implemented to prevent dangerous play in chipping the ball high across the field. However, these rules haven't evolved with the skills of modern players, who can execute complex aerial manoeuvres safely. The rules committee needs to consider these advanced skills and revise the rules to reflect the current state of play better, ensuring they do not unduly penalise legitimate, skilful actions.

📹 Watch the clip explored in depth on #WhatUpWednesday