Injectors injecting early on the penalty corner? Discover the remedy in this #FeatureFriday video, where we highlight one of the hundreds of clips in the fhu3t Clip Library. Find them all: 🟢🟡🔴🏑
A penalty stroke is awarded and upheld after video referral on this shoot-out attempt. The attacker avoids the jab tackle by the goalkeeper, who then pulls her stick back and takes the foot of the attacker and brings her to ground. This is analogous to a slide tackle where the ball carrier is able to change direction around the supine keeper, and the momentum of that body motion collides with the ball carrier and obstructs them from continuing to play the ball. This incident is correctly deemed an intentional foul in the sense of the attempt being high risk, high reward.
Find hundred more clips like this in the fhu3t Clip Library with a 🟡 membership.
🟢🟡🔴🏑
#fridayreads #hockey #fieldhockey #hockeyumpire #fieldhockeyumpire #rules #umpirelife #thirdteam #FIH #FIHumpire #rulesofhockey #rulesoffieldhockey #umpiring #umpiringlife #umpiringlessons #alwayslearning #fhumpires #fhumpirelife #hockeyvideo #fieldhockeyvideo #hockeyrules #fieldhockeyrules #arbitrohockey #regalodehockey #hockeyfordummies #rulesfordummies #communication #videoreferral
Questionable call. The GK did not move their stick into the attacker but reached out with the stick along the ground.
The attacker moved towards the GK and stepped onto the GK’s stick.
Is it clear that the GK pulled her stick back or did the forward momentum of the attacker’s foot cause the GK’s stick to move back? Note the attacker’s foot against the GK’s glove
Okay, here’s a thought. Had the GK’s stick been on the ground but “side on” and tripped the attacker, would you feel differently?
I think you would, and the problem is for many people commenting is that she stepped on the stick rather than was tripped. Again, the GK hasn’t tackled the ball and her stick isn’t just in a blocking position that the attacker steps/trips over. It’s extended and yet nowhere near the ball.