You cannot view this unit as you're not logged in yet.
Reader Interactions
Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
For field hockey umpires, by field hockey umpires
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More
Privacy Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
I don’t agree with this umpire’s decision! The defending player was physically blocked from being able to successfully tackle the player that scored
I think you’ve got a great point there!
A couple of things stand out to me:
a) Yes, the attacker at the top of the D does impede the defender from approaching the attacker with the ball.
b) The one thing I also noticed is the attacker at the top of the D takes a quick head turn peek to see where he’s positioned and if there’s a lane for a shot. This indicates clear intent.